Friday, March 15, 2019

Weird Western Tales 20 with Jonah Hex

If you think about comic book western characters, chances are good Jonah Hex will be among the first that come to mind. A former Confederate soldier, Hex now roams the west as a bounty hunter. If you know anything about him, it would be his face. Much like the Batman villain Two-Face, the right side of Hexes face is horribly scarred. I know little about the character to know how he got those scars, but it looks like fire played a part. His first appearance was in All-Star Western #10. That book soon got renamed Weird Western Tales with #12 and Hex became the star.

Issue #20 of Weird Western Tales counts as the first Hex story I’ve ever read. I’ve seen him in both the animated series Batman: Brave and the Bold and an episode of Legends of Tomorrow so I was interested in seeing him in print.

“Blood Brothers” has Hex coming into a town and taking away an AWOL cavalry soldier. That horseman turns out to be John Running Wolf, an Indian scout who was going to turn himself in anyway. “Then you don’t lose nuthin’—and I earn six months’ worth of dried beans, salt pork, and coffee,” Hex says matter-of-factly. No sooner does Hex deliver John than he’s hired to find Muriel, a “fine Boston lady who was kidnapped by Red Horse,” the very same Indian who allegedly was the one who led a raiding party against a nearby fort. Apparently never one to turn down a job, Hex accepts the job.

But things are not what they seem.

The ending shows a gunfight, fist fight, and Hex showing his true character.

Tony deZuniga does the art to an Arnold Drake story. As you could see above with the quote, Drake has Hex speak phonetically. “I” becomes “Ah,” “my” becomes “muh” and so on. A nice touch. DeZuniga’s art is really darn good. It’s still comic book art, but it’s often highly detailed, sometimes almost portrait like.


What’s always great about reading old comics are the ads. This 1973 issue pre-dates my discovering comics by a few years so I have no direct memory of some of this stuff. Kenner’s Deluxe Thrill Set of motorcycles and cars. The back cover sports Aurora’s The Imposters car which, when you look at it, morph a VW Beetle into a hot rod. Transformers? The center ad is two-fold. The cardstock ad is for jewelry (?) from Mark Jewelers, the same company from which I’d buy my high school ring. The paper ad was from the Record Club of America, what appears to be the pre-cursor to the Columbia Club that I joined in the 80s.

Neat stuff. The Jonah Hex story is pretty good. I’ll be heading to Comicpalooza on Friday,I certainly enjoyed it, and I’ll keep an eye out for more Weird Western Tales and Jonah Hex tales.

Do y'all have any particular recommendations? A Top 10 list of great Jonah Hex tales?

Thursday, March 14, 2019

You Can Find Great Story Structure Anywhere: Scooby Doo, Mystery Incorporated

One of my favorite modern cartoons was Scooby Doo: Mystery Incorporated. The show, which ran for two sporadic seasons, came at the perfect time for my boy, who had just discovered the original series and enjoyed it. But Mystery Inc. was something different. Not only did it issue meta commentary on the original series, it offered an excellent example of ongoing storytelling amid ‘monster of the week’ episodes.

If you breakdown just the first episode, you can see how the scenes were actually structured. Yeah, it’s the curse of a writer always to be mindful of how stories are constructed.

Effortlessly, scenes relayed not only the backstory and current situation of our five heroes—Fred, Velma, Daphne, Shaggy, and Scooby—but also subplots and main plots. Sure, it’s a cartoon, but that doesn’t mean it can’t be built like a movie.

And this episode was. The precise moment I realized it was when Velma was about to tell Scooby about her relationship with Shaggy—still not one of my favorite aspects of the show, but I understand why the writers inserted this aspect into the modern version—when the monster attacks the Mystery Machine. Thus, subplot averted for main plot. This subplot re-emerges one more time and then is tabled until the next episode. Ditto for the Daphne/Fred subplot.

The coolest thing is one of the clues. Daphne finds a key that is also a locket. Inside, there is a photo of a couple. She can’t figure out what it means to *this* episode until the end when the Bad Guy reveals he’s never seen it before.

But Fred’s dad, the mayor, has. The last scene is the gang at a local radio station and they get a call. A spooky voice says “You don’t know what you’ve uncovered: the truth of the curse of Crystal Cove.” When asked who the caller is, he identifies himself as Mister E. “And the real mystery is about to begin.” And the episode ends.

Boom! Now you’ve got an entire season’s worth of storytelling.

I really loved this show. Season 1 was pretty consistent in terms of airing, but Season 2 was sporadic. The casting was great. Patrick Warburton is the sheriff.  Each set of parents were an older reflection of the each gang member. Shaggy’s dad was voiced by Casey Kasum, the original Shaggy. The look, the feel, the vibe of the entire series is excellent. And the series finale is mindblowingly good.

Anyway, just thought I’d share some writerly thoughts about the first episode, “Beware the Beast from Below” of Scooby Doo and remind you that you can find inspiration about writing everywhere.

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Batman Summer Spectacular 1978

(In the run-up to this summer's 30th Anniversary of Batman '89--not to mention this month's celebration of the 80th Anniversary of Batman's first appearance-- I'm diving into lots of Bat-Stuff. Here's a piece I wrote last summer that I didn't post on this blog.)

To commemorate the end of summer 2018, let’s take a trip back forty years.

The summer of 1978 was smack dab in the middle of one of my favorite pockets of my life. You see, Star Wars had debuted the year before and it consume much of my imagination. It had awakened in me a love for all things science fiction and I sought out as much as I could, eventually discovering Edgar Rice Burroughs’s A PRINCESS OF MARS. I had discovered the rock and roll superheroes known as KISS through their albums, comics, and trading cards. And every issue of Circus or Hit Parader magazine I could find.

And, of course, there was the constant: comic books. I have memories of certain issues—where I bought them; what kind of day it was—but not all. Interestingly, as summer 2018 wound down, I was drawn to a forty-year-old comic of which I have no memory buying at the time. But I also have no memory of buying it in the years since, so it’s a logical conclusion that my ten-year-old self forked over a dollar bill for this unique issue.

Officially issue fifteen of the DC SPECIAL SERIES, the 1978 Batman Spectacular boasted of 68 pages of content and no ads. In reality, you get to 68 pages by using both interior covers. This issue is a true gem of my favorite era of Batman’s history: the Bronze Age. More or less, the Bronze Age of comics ran from 1970 to 1985. For Batman, the Bronze Age started with the pairing of writer Dennis O’Neil and artist Neal Adams in the early 70s to the publication of Frank Miller’s seminal THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS. In the 1970s, Bruce Wayne moved out of Wayne Manor and the Batcave and took up residence in the Wayne Foundation building. He was a detective, a creature of the night, and, most importantly, still a man. He could be hurt, both emotionally and physically, and he was, including this book.

The Batman Spectacular features three tales. The first, “Hang the Batman,” was written by David V. Reed and pencilled by Mike Nasser. The story centers on the death, by suicide, of a famous author, Archer Beaumont. But Beaumont believed it was possible to communicate from beyond the grave, a belief given new relevance when various signs start popping up around Gotham City. A cryptic note admonishes the Dark Knight Detective to solve Beaumont’s murder or Batman himself will meet death. He investigates, gets into fisticuffs, and, no spoiler here, solves the case.

Reed’s writing is crisp, fast-paced, and typical of the type of story from the 1970s. He provides all the clues the reader needs to solve the crime along with Batman. But it is the visual way Nasser (now Netzer) drew the panels that really set this story apart. His Batman is lithe yet muscular. He rarely treats a single page with traditional panels and borders. He visualizes the entire page as a canvas, seeking out new ways to tell the story. And he gives you interesting angles. I read this tale twice in a row I was so enthralled by his art.





The second story is by Dennis O’Neil and drawn by Michael Golden. It features Batman’s (likely) best nemesis, Ra’s Al Ghul, and Batman’s unwitting and unwanted marriage to Talia, Ra’s’s daughter. O’Neil co-created Ra’s with Neal Adams and this is a perfectly serviceable story, but it seems rather small. Ra’s is best when he’s trying to take over the world or do something for which he sees as right. Here, he’s just trying to steal some diamonds—in a manner fitting a James Bond villain. Golden’s art is as realistic as you could get from art in the 1970s, and helps elevate this story.

O’Neil redeemed himself with the third tale of this issue. Advertised as “Something New..Something Bold!”, “Death Strikes at Midnight and Three” is a Batman story told in prose by O’Neil and illustrated by the great Marshall Rogers. All three artists are fantastic at creating interesting visual storytelling. Rogers drew a series with writer Steve Engelhart many consider to be among the best Batman stories every told. The scenes he draws for O’Neil’s story are, like Nasser’s very visually interesting and almost minimal despite the exquisite detail.


But that’s okay, because the real stars here are O’Neil’s words. Free from a traditional comic book story, O’Neil’s prose is lavish in detail and is spun like a magician. And the details provided give a glimpse of a Batman rarely seen on comic pages. In one scene, Batman confronts a brute who thinks he can best the Caped Crusader. “The Batman shrugged. ‘Take your best shot.’” I loved the noncommittal nature of Batman here, the hero who knows he’ll win, the hero who has confronted countless thugs who think they’ll be the one to take down Batman.

As a writer, I especially appreciated how O’Neil didn’t always conform to proper grammar to paint his pictures with words. “The footfalls stopped. Snick of lighter. Odor of tobacco.” That’s it. Sure, you could write a paragraph, but why when a short few words will do the trick. The way he describes Gotham City is also splendid.

It is a monster sprawled along 25 miles of eastern seaboard, stirring and seething and ever-restless. Eight million human beings live on streets that, if laid end-to-end, would stretch all the way to Tokyo, crammed into thousands of neighborhood from the fire-gutted tenements of Chancreville, where rats nestle in babies’ bedclothes and grandmothers forage in garbage cans,to the penthouses of Manor row, where the cost of a single meal served by liveried servants would support an immigrant family for a year. It is countless chambers and crannies and corners in bars, boats, houses, hotels, elevators, offices, theaters, shacks, tunnels, depots, junkyards, cemeteries, buses, cars, trains, terms, bridges, docks, sewers, parks, jails, mortuaries—the shelters of living and dead, millionaires and bums, fiends and saints.
Napoleon’s armies could search for a lifetime and leave places unseen.
An exceptionally energetic investigator could visit the likely ones in a month.
The Batman had less than sixty minutes.

Come on! You can see that as clear as any artist. O’Neil’s love of old pulp fiction, especially The Shadow, bleeds off the page. And how’s this description of Batman emerging to take on a couple of crooks in front of a movie screen: “The Batman, stark and implacable against the expanse of white, a grim figure congealing from the shadows.” So, so good.

I highly encourage you to seek out this issue. The entire thing has not been republished elsewhere. The Ra’s tale you can find in Tales of the Demon. The prose story is reprinted in The Greatest Batman Stories Ever Told, Legends of the Dark Knight: Marshall Rogers and in Batman: The Greatest Stories Ever Told.

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Movie Review: Bohemian Rhapsody

If I were the writer of this film, I knew the perfect ending. Turns out, I was right.

As a kid who came of age in the late 1970s and attended high school in the 1980s, Queen was just always there. I owned every record starting with "Jazz" and it was them who compelled me to ask "Who's that guy singing with Queen on this great song 'Under Pressure'?" and was thus introduced to David Bowie.

But I didn't know a lot about the band itself. Sure, we all knew Freddie Mercury. He was the outlandish singer who strutted around the stage with a mic and half a stand. Brian May was the awesome guitar player with a massive amount of hair whose guitar tone you could pick out of a line up. Bassist John Deacon and drummer Roger Taylor were the other two. It was rare for me to know the names of all the members of a band that wasn't KISS, but Queen fit that bill. Needless to say, I knew the band's pretty well, including the discography and dates, and I was eager to jump into this new film about the band, but centered on Freddie Mercury.

I enjoyed the film, but I'll admit that knowing the chronology so well kept jolting me out of the film with the occasional "That's not the right year" or "That song came out later."

Shrug.

I'm a big fan of learning how bands got together. Young Freddie Mercury, working at Heathrow airport, wants to be a singer. He stumbles into a club and sees May and Taylor playing in a band call Smile. When he mentions he writes songs, the pair pretty much shuffle him away. Until Freddie turns and belts out a few well-sung notes.

May and Taylor reconsider.

From here, the movie jumps from this crucial scene to that one. It is mostly linear, but the jumps can be a few months or a few years. With the title like "Bohemian Rhapsody," you know you'll get the recording of the song and the album from which it comes, and those scenes do not disappoint. To be honest, the more I watched this movie, the more I wanted the documentary on the band. I suppose it's out there somewhere. I'll have to look it up.

Ever since this film was announced back in 2010, I was ready for it. The original actor tapped for the role of Freddie was Sasha Baron Cohen. When I heard that, I nodded in approval. Then he dropped out and Rami Malek was cast. The guy from Night at the Museum? Maybe so. Then that first image appeared, and I knew they had cast well.


Malek portrayed Freddie Mercury so well, he won the Oscar for Best Actor. He did a splendid job, all but disappearing as himself. Rarely in the film did I think "Oh, that's Rami playing Freddie." Yeah, there are critics who think Rami didn't 100% own the role because he lip synced to Queen's music, but let's be honest: who in the world can sing like Freddie Mercury other than Freddie Mercury? That Rami nailed Freddie's on-stage antics was more than fine.

And I nailed the ending.

If you ask anyone who saw Queen what their greatest performance was, they'd say Live Aid. I remember that day--13 July 1985--very well. I woke up at six Houston time and basically did nothing but watch that broadcast all day long. Heck, David Bowie was going to perform and I'd never seen him live at that point. But when Queen came on and did what they did, my teenaged self was amazed. Who else but Queen could get a stadium full of people to sing "Radio Gaga" and clap their hands in unison? It was mesmerizing.

It was equally mesmerizing in the film. They all but performed the entire set in the movie. I loved seeing how not only the crowds but folks in bars watching all gradually got into Queen's performance. It was clearly the highlight of the film, and Rami and the rest of the actors playing Queen did so well, you'd think you were watching the real band. Speaking of other actors, it wasn't until I saw his name a few minutes ago that it dawned on me who played John Deacon. It was Joseph Mazzello. Ring a bell? He was the kid from Jurassic Park!

After the movie, my wife told us about seeing the band live here in Houston in 1977. Her descriptions of the concert opening, in darkness, to "We Will Rock You" sounded very cool. I'll have to scour YouTube to see if there are any videos of the era.

Now, I do have a criticism. When the Live Aid segment was over, the film faded to black and you read about Freddie's death from AIDS. In the film's chronology, Freddie had AIDS when Live Aid happened. My wife and I both questioned that. I don't think he did, but since the movie had the blessing of the remaining members of the band, maybe he did.

Doesn't really matter. Bohemian Rhapsody is a good film about a great band with an outstanding singer. And if nothing else, it'll make you remember and appreciate just how many awesome songs they wrote that are a part of your life.

Monday, March 11, 2019

Castle: A Ten-Year Appreciation

This show had me at the trailer.

Love at First Sight


Somehow, it's been ten years since the TV show "Castle" first debuted. It was 9 March 2009, a Monday. It was in the 9pm slot, opposite ratings juggernaut and personal favorite show "CSI: Miami." But on that night, there was never a doubt at to which show we'd watch live and which show we'd tape. Sorry, David Caruso, you got bumped.

And every subsequent Monday night.

You see, "Castle" was right up my alley. The show starred Nathan Fillion, the guy from the cancelled show "Firefly." The wife liked Firefly and it was an easy sell to get her to watch Castle live, at least the first night. That was the nibble. The story and the characters of that debut episode, "Flowers for Your Grave," set the hook.

Every Monday night for eight seasons, I was glued to the TV. If the phone rang anytime during the 9pm hour on Monday, it wasn't answered. I was too focused on the show. Each week, I was entertained, charmed, and, truth be told, educated in how to write this kind of twisty mystery story.

A Writer's Education


I would love to be able to say that I watched Castle then became a famous novelist myself. Nope. But I learned the vibe of the show, the play-off of each character against the rest of the ensemble, and how story is structured. I know I absorbed that information because I can recognize it in my own writing.

I have watched various episodes over and over, breaking down the beats and outlining the story, just to understand how a story is constructed. The writing was always strong on this show, but a script is only words on paper. You need strong actors to bring these characters to life, and "Castle" struck a mother lode of talent.

A Gem of a Cast


Sure, Nathan Fillion is a famous actor, but he always comes across as that good friend who has connections that'll get you backstage at a Comic Con so you can meet the latest Hollywood actor. Truth be told, I think Fillion brought a lot of himself to the role of Castle, and he took the fictional character to another level. I don't think even creator Andrew W. Marlowe knew how well Fillion would fill out the role. It's safe to say that if any other actor was cast in this role, the character of Richard Castle would have been something else entirely. With Firefly, we pretty much knew what were going to get with Fillion as Castle, and he knocked it out of the park every single week.

But with a TV mystery show that centers itself on a romance, Fillion would only be as good as the actress cast opposite him. And in Stana Katic, the creators found perfection.

For longtime fans of the show, I think a lot of us contend the show could have easily been titled "Beckett." Katic plays Detective Kate Beckett, hard-nosed NYPD homicide cop who is as by-the-book as you could get. From episode one, Castle correctly guesses what drives her: the death of a family member. In this case, it was Beckett's mother who was killed, and that was the turning point in the young lady's life. She became a cop, and sought out justice on behalf of those who could not.

Katic didn't merely play Beckett as a no-nonsense cop. She brought real depth to the role. She fleshed out the character way beyond what was originally intended. In a show with Fillion's name more or less at the top of the marquee, it was Katic's Beckett who turned out to be the true star of the show. That's not taking anything away from Fillion or any of the other cast members. It's just that Stana Katic was that good.

Characters as a Family


In nearly every TV show, the core cast become a sort of surrogate family. And if Beckett was the mom and Castle the goofy dad, then Detectives Javier Esposito (Jon Huertas) and Seamus Dever's Detective Kevin Ryan were the kids. The two mismatched detectives--Esposito, the tough former soldier, and Ryan, the smallish but dogged former narcotics cop--were a fun B story each week. In the eight seasons, the two actors were able to bring a lot of chemistry to these two characters, so much so that I would have watched a spin-off series with just them.

Speaking of family, the divorced Richard Castle lives in a nice New York apartment with his teen-aged daughter, Alexis (Molly Quinn), and his mother, Martha Rodgers (Susan Sullivan). As goofy as Castle could be with Alexis--playing laser tag indoors, cosplaying as some space cowboy with a brown coat--he dearly loved his daughter and mother, and they him. These three actors forged a bond so good you'd be surprised they weren't actually a family. And as time went on, as Castle's relationship with Beckett blossomed, the two stalwart ladies in Castle's orbit welcomed her with love and open arms.

Will They or Won't They


Speaking of the relationship central to the series, the creators did an excellent job of maintaining the romantic tension for four years. Look, from the outset, we knew Castle and Beckett were going to end up together. We watched to see how. And to avoid the pitfalls of previous shows.

Two favorite shows that pre-dated Castle were "Moonlighting" and "The X-Files." In both shows, but especially Moonlighting, when the two leads ended up romantically together, the show fell apart. I'm confident Marlowe, Rob Bowman, and the other showrunners were dead-set on crafting a show that kept the sexual tension high, but not prolonged past its inevitable prime. When the pair finally had that steamy, passionate kiss in the finale of Season 4, it was well and truly earned. I'm a romantic at heart and now, remembering that scene and writing about it, makes me fell all warm and toasty inside.

Going into Season 5, everyone wondered how the united Castle and Beckett (AKA "Caskett) would work. Would the show be another Moonlighting casualty? Fans needn't have worried. A template for how the pair could co-exist was already out there in plain sight.

The Meta Nature of Castle


In the series premiere, novelist Castle is suffering from writer's block. He has killed off his main character, Derek Storm, but doesn't know what to write next. The events of that episode--someone is killing people and staging the corpses the same way Castle did in his books--leads Beckett to Castle for some insight. She's a fan and has read all her books, something he clues in on quickly. In the process of helping Beckett solve her case, Castle is inspired to write a new series about a no-nonsense lady detective by the name of Nikki Heat, based on Beckett. Castle uses his connections with the mayor's office to get himself assigned to the precinct so he can observe and gather details for his new book series.

By the fall of 2009 when the second season starts, the TV show "Castle" has the character Castle promoting his new book, HEAT WAVE. In an utterly brilliant bit of cross-promotion, you could go to your nearest bookstore and actually purchase the novel itself. On the back was a photo of Nathan Fillion as Castle. For all intents and purposes, this was a book by Richard Castle about the character Nikki Heat as inspired by Kate Beckett.

The Nikki Heat books are the mirror image of the TV show "Castle." Beckett is Heat, the character of Castle is Jameson Rook, journalist, while Esposito and Ryan become Detectives Ochoa and Raley, cutely nicknamed "Roach." But, more importantly, in the first book, Heat and Rook get together.

For a time, each new fall season of the TV show would bring a new novel in the real-world bookshelves. In the relationship of Heat and Rook, readers could see how how Castle and Beckett could still have tension between them and still be in love. I have read all of these books via their audiobook versions, and both narrators--Johnny Heller and Robert Petkoff--really nail the sardonic Fillion-like vibe.

These books became an integral part of enjoying this show for me, so much so, that when the show was cancelled, I knew the Castle books would end, too.*

That Final Season


Let's get one thing straight: I loved every episode of Castle, but there were some that didn't always reach the lofty levels of the best episodes. I think we can all agree on that, right?

As the seventh season neared its conclusion, the ABC network hadn't decided to renew the series or not. Wanting to please the fans, the writers ended the seventh season incredibly well. If that season finale turned out to be the series finale, it would be perfection.

But we got an eighth season. And of the episodes that didn't reach said lofty level, some were in this season. My wife, an avid watcher with me, peeled away from the series early on in the eighth season. I think it was mainly a reaction to the way Castle and Beckett were forced apart. Gone was the witty banter and fun of the show revolving around two character who had come to love and trust one another. In its place was a seemingly out-of-the-blue story arc that took Beckett away and left Castle with Esposito and Ryan. They have good chemistry, too, but the center wasn't as solid as before.

By the time the eighth season came into the spring of 2016, rumors were rampant as to a ninth season. Judging from the quality of the eighth, even I, a die-hard fan, started questioning whether or not the show should continue. When the news broke that the contracts for Stana Katic and co-star Tamala Jones would not be renewed for a potential ninth season, fans reacted with passion. How in the world could you have Castle without Beckett? You could, but it wouldn't be the same show.

In a wild reverse of how Star Trek fans lobbied for that show's renewal, Castle fans lobbied for ABC to cancel the show rather than have a Beckett-less Castle. Who can say if they truly played a role, but Castle was cancelled, ending up at eight seasons.

Still a Wonderful Show


I've met a few folks in the years since Castle ended who never watched the show and ask me about it. When I start in on my enthusiastic response and praise of the show, they probably wished they wouldn't have asked. I wax eloquent about this show, the characters, the stories, the books. It all comes spilling out. And, to be 100% frank, I often tell them to stop at season 7. That ending was perfection to a show I have loved since Day One.

It is a show that is among my favorites of all time. It holds a special place for me, and I will love it.

How long, you ask?

Always.


*Tomorrow, a brand-new book, CRASHING HEAT, comes out!

Sunday, March 10, 2019

Movie Review: Captain Marvel

If it was opening day for a super-hero movie, then you know I was there.

I saw Marvel's new film, "Captain Marvel" on Friday night. Oddly, the theater with the RPX screening--i.e., bigger screen, bigger chairs, bigger sound, and bigger price--was not full. Not by a long shot.

But the people who were there were die-hard fans. How did I know? When the "Marvel Studios" logo was run and instead of showing all the heroes in all the movies...they showed all the Stan Lee cameos with a simple "Thank you Stan" right after it. I'll admit, I got emotional. But the fans in the theater clapped and cheered. I did, too.

I know next to nothing about any of the various Captain Marvel characters. The only thing I know for sure is the original (?) one, the one named Mar-Vel, died in 1981 or so...and has stayed dead. I always admired that about Marvel Comics.

So, going into this movie, I was a super-hero fan but I was going to be shown something new. And I loved it. The movie starts in space, on a planet called Hala. Brie Larsen is a character named Vers (pronounced Veers). She's part of StarForce, and her mission is to extract one of their own from the vile, green-skinned, shape-shifting Skrulls.

Naturally, things go awry.

She's captured by the lead Skrull, Talos (played wonderfully by Ben Mendelsohn) and her memories are tapped. She escapes and lands in Los Angeles 1995. Now we get a fun fish-out-of-water story with Vers being all earnest in her mission, never telling a lie, teamed up with Samuel L. Jackson's Nick Fury early in his career.

And the results are pretty darn hilarious.

The odd pairing makes for a standard buddy movie where each character has to learn about the other. We get some backstory on Vers--real name Carol Danvers--meet some people in her past, and have lots and lots of things that'll make those of us who lived through the 1990s smile and point and laugh.

As I mentioned, Mendelsohn is under make-up for most of the film, but his acting chops really shine through. There are more than a few moments when you really see his talent no matter the prosthetic. Larsen is an actress I cannot say I've seen in anything else. But she is charming in her own way. She knows what she's doing is right and she's set on completing the mission. When she faces things that counteract what she knows, she has to confront them.

And, most importantly, she's having a blast being a super-hero. So refreshing.

Jackson plays Jackson so you know what you're going to get. Nothing wrong with that.

Stan Lee's cameo is so, so wonderful because, for the first time, he's actually playing himself. That he's reading the script for Kevin Smith's "Mallrats" movie now makes the professional fan/podcaster/writer/director part of the Marvel cinematic universe. I suspect he's beyond thrilled.

Captain Marvel is a fun movie with way more humor than I expected, lots of great super-hero/space battles. It seems the movies of Summer 2019 now start in March.

Saturday, March 9, 2019

Year of an Indie Writer: Week 10

Blogging can be very tempting.

Two Blogs?


I have two blogs: my original one via blogspot and my author one. My initial thought back in 2015 when I started the author blog was to ditch the blogspot and focus only on the author one. Later, I realized there were some benefits to having two blogs so I converted the blogspot one to be strictly for my western pen name. Now, I've come around to maintaining both blogs with more or less identical content.

Overkill? Most likely, but I prefer to reach as many folks as possible. Plus, the blogspot site has all my blogs since 2008, and that's worth something. Another factor is that the blogspot one might come across less like an author site than the actual author one. In fact, I'm thinking about rebranding the blogspot site with something more personal. That way, I'll be able to just write about stuff that the Author Self might not. Not sure. Still pondering.

Oh, and commenting on blogspot is much easier.

So, for the time being, they're still going to be identical. You can read my posts however you want.

Blog Writing 


Let's face it: we writers enjoy not only the act of writing and creating but also the joy of interaction. With fiction writing, there is always the inevitable lag. We sit in front of our computer's and write the story. No matter how much excitement this part of the process generates, it often dissipates waiting for the story to reach readers.

Not so with blog writing. With our various blogging platforms and the social media to spread the the link around, we can get eyes on our posts within minutes of putting in that final period. Throw in comments and we can have all but immediate feedback.

It's intoxicating. But also detrimental. The time spent crafting a blog post is time not spent writing. And if you are in a boat similar to mine--day job with not quite two hours available per day for fiction writing--writing time is very precious. Once gone, it never comes back.

Which is why I instituted a new personal policy when it comes to writing a blog post: a 15-minute segment is all I'll devote to a blog post at any one time. Often, if I have some thoughts on a subject, I know I can concisely get my thoughts on pixel in that time. It'll probably come in around 500 words. Long enough for a blog post.

In this manner, I'll maintain not only constant blog posts--for all those algorithms--but also keep more time ready for actual fiction writing.

These weekly Indie Author posts are longer than normal...but I also work on them throughout the week and not in one giant session.

Writing Anywhere at Anytime


Can you? Can you write anywhere at anytime?

Thankfully, I always have been able to do this. Good thing, too.

On Monday, I took my boy to Main Event so he could have some team-building time with his co-workers. We left at 7:15 pm and stayed until 9:40 or so. I brought my Chromebook, my Kindle, and a steno pad. I intended to work. With bowling, pools, an arcade, and a booming soundtrack right above my head...well, it wasn't exactly quiet.

Nothing at all like my 4:30 am writing time in my house when I'm truly the only one awake.

What did I do? Finished reading FARADAY: THE IRON HORSE by James Reasoner. Finished writing the book review I posted this past Wednesday. Finished the then latest chapter on the new Ben Wade, PI, short story/novella. All with all of that distraction.

When we left, my boy asked if I was able to get work done. When I listed my accomplishments, even he seemed impressed.

Being able to write anywhere at anytime is a good tool to have in one's toolbox.

What I'm Reading/Finished


Speaking of THE IRON HORSE, have you read my review of this fantastic book by the prolific storyteller James Reasoner? I really enjoyed the tale.

My book club met this past Tuesday. We discussed Jeff VanderMeer's BORNE. While the book was clearly competently written, it was not for me.

For some reason, I've had a hankering to read some classic franchise novels. Forty years ago next month, Brian Daley's HAN SOLO AT STARS' END was published. It's the book I selected for the book club. In addition to that, I'm reading an old Star Trek novel by Barbara Hambly, ISHMAEL.

My current audiobook is APOLLO 8: The Thrilling Story of the First Mission to the Moon by Jeffrey Kluger. As we gear up to the 50th anniversary of Apollo 11 this July, I looked up Apollo 9 and 10. We are currently in the 50-year-old window of Apollo 9 (3-13 March 1969). Apollo 10 starts in May.


Oh, and I likely watched--and loved--"Captain Marvel" last night...but here, in real time, I haven't seen it yet. :-)

Friday, March 8, 2019

Forgotten Books: Mascarada Pass by William Colt MacDonald (2019)

(2019 update. On a lark, I scoured this blog to see the book I reviewed first for Patti Abbott's Friday's Forgotten Books way back in 2008. How ironic, then, did I rediscover it was a mystery set in the old west by a railroad detective.

In my introduction to EMPTY COFFINS, the first Calvin Carter: Railroad Detective book, I openly acknowledge the role Gregory Quist played in forming my own character. Back in 2008 when this review was written, I began looking for old Quist novels in used bookstores. I found a few to add to the collection I inherited from my grandfather, but I only read two of them. Now, in 2019, as I've written six Carter novels, I may have to read another Quist novel and see how Carter and Quist compare. From what I can remember about Quist, he was a true cowboy whereas Carter is a refined actor. To be honest, Quist and Carter's partner, Thomas Jackson, would probably get along just fine.

Anyway, I thought I would republish my very first Forgotten Book today.)

----------

After Patti Abbott graciously invited me to submit a book for her Friday Forgotten Books collection, I was excited and worried. You see, I’m putting myself through a sort of self-education in crime fiction, learning its history, and determining where my own fiction fits in. Thus, books that are forgotten by many readers are brand-new to me. You can peruse my reviews of other crime fiction here on my blog and get my take on what I've read so far. But today I begin with a western--a western mystery, that is--by an author I never heard of until I opened a box of books my grandfather owned.

When one thinks of westerns, three names immediately come to mind: Louis L’amour, Max Brand, and Zane Gray. At least that’s how I see it as a lifelong SF geek looking through the barbed wire fence at the pasture that is the western genre. My dad got the box of L’amour books. I got the box of everything else. And, amid all the Luke Shorts and Giles Lutz books--and a few Perry Masons, Cool and Lams, Ellery Queens, and Mary Rogers Rinehearts--I found about ten novels by William Colt MacDonald. Cool western writer name, to be sure. Among the MacDonald books were six books about Gregory Quist, a railroad detective for the Texas Northern and Arizona Southern Railroad Company. Shoot, I thought, how unique is that. If I’m going to read a western, might as well be one with a mystery involved.

Mascarada Pass (1954) is the earliest of the novels I have so I started with it. One of the words MacDonald uses to describe Quist’s features is his ‘aquiline nose.’ Any reader of Sherlock Holmes will know that the English detective has the same adjective used on him as the railroad detective. With a deft use of one word, MacDonald let us in on Quist’s secret weapon: his mind. But this is a western and you know Quist is handy with a six-shooter. And he has ample circumstances to demonstrate his prowess.

Quist is dispatched to the town of Masquerade City once the railroad company determines that the recent freight train derailment was man-impelled.” He arrives only to discover that one of the more respected men in town, Reed Haldane, took his own life the very night of train crash. Quist’s reputation precedes him and two of Haldane’s hands--Ramon and Chris who constantly feud with each other for Quist’s attention--enlist the detective’s help in discovering the culprit who killed Haldane. They don’t think Haldane took his own life. They believe it was murder.

Like a good pulp story, the two seemingly unrelated story lines are connected but Quist has no evidence. And it is through the method Quist gathers his evidence that the true charm of the book shines. Unlike Sherlock Holmes who rarely doubts his own abilities, Quist constantly questions himself at places throughout the book, even going so far as to question his own assumptions. Quist sends Chris and Ramon on various errands, gathers their results and the evidence they’ve seen, and pieces it all together. He deals with the rival family Haldane crossed twenty years before. And, as in all good pulp stories whether western, crime, or SF, he has to deal with the alluring daughter of the recently deceased.

My research into William Colt MacDonald revealed that he only wrote westerns but Mascarada Pass would fit nicely into anyone’s mystery collection. He plants the clues for Quist to find and for the reader to digest. And, in good Nero Wolfe or Nick Charles fashion, Quist keeps the results to himself and gathers all concerned for the big reveal. I won’t spoil the ending here but, suffice it to say, I saw part of the ending coming. I guess that makes me as smart as Gregory Quist. But not nearly as fast with a gun as he is.

In my review of Allan Guthrie’s Kiss Her Good-bye, I make mention of casual violence. That is, violence that seems to erupt out of nowhere and is gone almost as fast. That is the kind of violence in Mascarada Pass. It’s swift and brutal, but not gory. Death happens in a matter of fact way. It’s a part of life in the old west.

MacDonald’s writing style is somewhat dated. The story is all third-person with only the first two chapters not featuring Quist. Once he steps on stage, MacDonald never leaves Quist’s POV. As was customary back in the 50s, MacDonald uses adverbs profusely (heh) whereas we modern writers strive for a near adverb-less style. Like a good Elmore Leonard character, Quist’s personality emerges through his dialogue, at times laconic and hard-edged. MacDonald also uses dialogue as shorthand for personality. Ramon Serrano, one of Quist’s helpers, is a Mexican-born character and his dialogue is written as if it were from a 1940s western movie, dialect intact. For example: “Eet was my idea--” Serrano cut in indignantly. The same technique was applied to the town drunk: “What in. . hic! . . you care . . where I buy’em?” It was annoying at first but I got used to it. Different time, different style.

The one charming aspect of the book I really enjoyed was the chapter titles. Remember those old Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew books with those fun chapter titles? Remember how, as you started a new chapter, you wondered what the cryptic chapter title really meant? That’s how it was with Mascarada Pass. I haven’t read a book like that in a long time.

Mascarada Pass was a fun book, especially as a first western for me. It checked off all the major things a western needs--gun fights, ambushes, dusty towns--and filled in the cracks with a solid mystery. Gregory Quist is a good character, complete with good brains, a little self-doubt, but fortitude enough to get the job done. It goes without saying that I’ll be reading the other Quist books in my collection. I recommend Gregory Quist as a character that needs to be remembered again. Go ahead and start with Mascarada Pass.

Thursday, March 7, 2019

Magnum PI (2018)

As a fan of the TV show CASTLE, I loved that the pilot episode of MAGNUM PI (2018) started with the characters reading the exploits of themselves in a book. It explained how it was we first saw Thomas Magnum in space, skydiving into North Korea.
And served as a teaser for what was a perfectly fine hour of television, especially on a Monday night.
Now, I’m of an age where I remember the original with Tom Selleck. However, I was not an avid watcher of the program. I knew the basics: Magnum was a veteran who lived in Hawaii, had a job as a private investigator, and lived in the home of Robin Masters, a mysterious figure we never saw and the only connection was Higgins, the caretaker of the estate. In the original version, Higgins was played by Texan John Hillerman, doing a great British accent. With Magnum were two pals from his time in Vietnam and they shared in Magnum’s adventures.
Magnum PI 2018 is pretty much the same thing except we get a real British person playing Higgins, Perdita Weeks (sister of Honeysuckle Weeks of Foyle’s War). The gender swap will likely lead to some romantic tension between the two characters. Yes, that will change the dynamic, but that isn’t a bad thing. While I pretty much envision Magnum and Higgins to pair up after a while, they could always go the route of TV’s ELEMENTARY, where Sherlock Holmes and Joan Watson respected each other but never hooked up. It can happen.
The pilot episode showed what was updated and what wasn’t. The coolest thing that was kept was the theme song and the typical 80s-era credits sequence. I dug it. Now, Magnum and his three friends are veterans of Afghanistan. It was when one of their number is kidnapped and killed that Magnum–played by Jay Hernandez–Rick (Zachary Knighton) and TC (Stephen Hill) join forces and bring the bad guys to justice. In addition to the gender swap, Higgins is also former MI-6 (disavowed), so she called in favors to help locate a missing truck, and she kicked some bad guy butt along the way. Natch. The action was fun and over-the-top, but what were you expecting?
I expected a fun, light romp to replace the Monday night vacancy voided by ELEMENTARY. Magnum PI might not be everyone’s cup of tea, but as someone who doesn’t remember much of the material from the original, I’m good with the show.

Wednesday, March 6, 2019

Faraday: The Iron Horse by James Reasoner

The ways to start a western are numerous, but is there any better way than an all-out chase on horse?
Carl Duncan is in trouble. He is driving his horse as hard as possible over the flat plains in Kansas. Behind him are a band of Indians, themselves on horseback.

And they’re gaining.

Knowing he can not make it to the railhead of the Kansas Pacific, the new line being constructed across Indian territory, Duncan goes to plan B: he climbs a telegraph pole and taps into the line. If only he can send a message, he can tell of what he knows. There’s a white man behind the recent Indian attacks against the railhead. And Duncan knows who it is. Alas for him, arrows puncture his leg and he’s captured before he can reveal the name. A pity for him, but not for us readers. Because we don’t know what Duncan saw, we are treated to a delightful tale of the old west.

First in a Series


Thirty years ago, James Reasoner wrote FARADAY: THE IRON HORSE. It is the first of a new series featuring a detective agency based in Kansas, headed by Matthew Faraday. Conceived by author Paul Block, who was an editor at Book Creations, Inc., the Faraday series was intended to be standalone tales with bossman Faraday as the through line. Each entry would focus on a different detective in the agency. It is a great concept and one that enabled multiple writers to put their stamp on this short-lived collection of books.

Matthew Faraday is an older man, but with the fire of justice still burning brightly through him. He takes a meeting with an old friend, Amos Rowland, owner of the Kansas Pacific railroad. The baron suspects the troubles out near the railhead are part of a larger means of sabotaging his line. He wants Faraday’s agency to investigate.

Faraday has just the man. Daniel Britten, aged around twenty-five, is not what you’d think of as a typical western hero. He’s shorter than most, and much more educated. Those qualities, and his upstanding honor, is what carries this tale forward. After meeting with Faraday and Rowland--and Rowland’s beautiful daughter, Deborah--Britten is dispatched out to the railhead to conduct his investigation under the ruse of him being a draftsman.

Once at the railhead, Britten starts looking around, asking questions, and a slew of interesting characters emerge. Deborah is there, having gone out on the same train as Britten. Her fiance, Terrence Jennings, is the construction boss, a man as big as the west with the fists and brawn to back it up. Sam Callighan is an old buffalo man, a surveyor, and one who has had good relations with the Indians. Mordecai Vint is an old geezer, a trader, and one who has been around the area often. His granddaughter, Laura, is his only friend. Throw in a few cowboys and other assorted people, and you’ve got the old west version of a whodunit.

And that’s what makes this book so much fun to read. Through Britten’s investigative process, he discovers clues, sifts the evidence, and formulates theories. Things happen and he is left constantly guessing. As are the readers.

A Gifted Storyteller


Reasoner weaves all of these people in and out of the main narrative with an ease that can only come from years behind a keyboard. His deft characterizations make all these people walk off the page, full-blooded and alive. The dexterity by which he shows you only what you need to see will keep you guessing the identity of the true villain until the last bit of the book. At least he did for me.
I’ve made no secret that I admire Reasoner’s manner of writing. It was his Longarm books that paved the way for my own Calvin Carter: Railroad Detective series. But as I was sucked into this story, two things happened. One, time slipped by imperceptibly. I woke on Sunday thinking I’d read a chapter or two before church. Over two hours later, I had to reluctantly put the Kindle down and hurriedly get ready.

The second is the sheer storytelling prowess. It feels effortless. Now, as a writer myself, I know it takes work, and lots of it, to get a story ready for the public. And with more than 365 books under his belt, Reasoner is a modern pulp master. I constantly highlighted passages, making notes not only about the story, but also about turns of phrase, ways the author highlighted this or that thing.
It is so rewarding to become engrossed in a James Reasoner novel. That THE IRON HORSE is so darn entertaining on the action, western, and mystery fronts is, well, par for the course with a Reasoner book.

We’ve come to expect nothing less.

Of the fiction I've read to date in 2019, this is my favorite. How much did I enjoy this story? I already ordered THE COLORADO SPECIAL as written by Bill Crider.



Background


I was curious about the process Reasoner went through to revise this story from the original 1988 published book, and he graciously answered some of my questions, including the genesis of the entire series.

"Paul Block, who was an editor at Book Creations Inc. as well as writing books for them from time to time, came up with the concept and Matthew Faraday's name, but as I recall, there wasn't really a series bible, just discussions on the phone about what the series would be like. It was set up so that each book would be a stand-alone with different agents working for Faraday and his agency. I remember Paul sent me a list of possible heroes, just their names and maybe a one-line description, and Daniel Britten was one of them. The plot of THE IRON HORSE was mine, though, and I assume the other authors came up with the plots for their books. I know Bill [Crider] did because he and I were always in pretty close contact and knew what the other one was writing."

"In order to produce the new edition of THE IRON HORSE, Livia scanned and OCRed a copy of the original paperback, went through the file to clean up the OCR errors, then turned it over to me. I went through the file adding, deleting, and rewriting to bring it more in line with the way I write now. It's not like there are huge differences in the two versions, but there are lots and lots of small changes that I think make the writing flow better and give more depth to the characters."

Tuesday, March 5, 2019

Chicago XIV: Reconsidered and Remixed

Chicago XIV is widely considered the nadir of the band’s fifty-one-year career. It was the album where Chicago hit a commercial rock bottom, but with a little tweaking, Chicago XIV could have been something else entirely.

After the death of founding member, guitarist Terry Kath, in early 1978, Donnie Dacus joined the band as lead guitarist and vocalist on their twelfth album (Hot Streets) and Chicago 13. Poor sales and changing music trends prompted the band to part ways with Dacus, hire Chris Pinnick on guitar, and record their next album. It tanked on the charts, yielding a couple of singles few people heard, acted as a harbinger of much of the band’s output in the 1980s, and was one of the main reasons Columbia Records severed their relationship with the band.

In the last year, however, I’ve been listening to the record again. Specifically, I’m listening to the 2003 remastered version from Rhino Records where three new songs recorded during the original sessions were added as bonus cuts. “Doin’ Business” was already available as the extra song on the Group Portrait box set (raise your hand if you bought an entire box set for one song) but “Soldier of Fortune” and “Live it Up” gave listeners a new peek into the studio circa 1980. Of all the remastered CDs back in 2003, XIV was arguably the best since you actually got new never-before-heard songs, including one (Live It Up) sung by Peter Cetera. It was definitely a thrill.

Comedian Jimmy Pardo (Never Not Funny) on Craig Smith’s SamePageCast 18 (Chicago for Beginners) examining the Columbia years of Chicago’s catalog basically called XIV a Peter Cetera solo album. He’s not entirely incorrect. On closer listen, however, and with a different track order, XIV could have been an underappreciated gem of an album. Would it have been a hit? Probably not. The songs are the same. The musical trends in 1980 were the same, but I’m considering this an interesting thought experiment by a long-time fan.

The Original Album's Tracklist


Side One
1. Manipulation
2. Upon Arrival
3. Song for You
4. Where Did the Lovin’ Go
5. Birthday Boy

Side Two
6. Hold On
7. Overnight Cafe
8. Thunder and Lightning
9. I’d Rather Be Rich
10. The American Dream

The White Board


The original album contained ten songs. The remastered version has thirteen. I decided to maintain the 10-song run time, five songs per side. I listened to all thirteen songs the other day and wrote the songs down on a white board. I color-coded the titles with red as an up-tempo song and green as a ballad. I added a “(B)” to note if the Chicago brass were prominent and a “(G)” for Pinnick’s guitar work. Chicago XIV is a Peter Cetera-centered album so I marked Robert Lamm’s songs with an “RL”. Lastly, I created two columns, a “Keep” and a “Discard.” The blue numbers are how I’d restructure the album. Here’s the screenshot.




My biggest problem with the original order is much the same issue I have with Chicago 30 (yeah, I’m using the number because I don’t want to have three Xs on my post): too many ballads next to each other. Chicago albums are best when there is a mix of tempos and styles. So even if you kept the original ten songs, they still should have been re-ordered.

So, without further ado, here’s my version of Chicago XIV.

New Side 1


Manipulation – This Lamm-sung tune is likely the closest Chicago would ever get to punk. It’s a strong opener and also serves as an excellent introduction (see what I did there?) to the prowess of Pinnick on guitar. This is a song you play for anyone who still thinks Chicago is only a ballad band. I contend that Pinnick’s solo is arguably the greatest non-Kath solo on any Chicago studio album.

Overnight Café – This mid-tempo cut, sung by Cetera, starts out rather minimally, but soon cuts into some more guitar fretwork by Pinnick. It would have served as a nice introduction of Cetera as the new main force in the band that could still rock (rather than original track 2, the ballad “Upon Arrival”). The opening and closing would have served as a bridge between Manipulation and the first true ballad on the record, Song for You.

Song for You – “If You Leave Me Now” may have been the harbinger of things to come in the 1980s, but Song for You was the prototype for all the Cetera-sung tunes of the decade. It’s a simple song, showcasing both Cetera’s lower and higher range. It’s clearly in the mold of “Colour My World” complete with the acoustic guitar playing a short solo. It’s a pleasant song and I’ve always enjoyed it, but not anywhere as good as what was to come on Chicago 16 and 17.

Thunder and Lightning – The single from XIV is sung by both Cetera and Lamm. It’s likely the most famous tune on the album. It’s a spare song, complete with a great guitar groove, slick horn arrangement, and both singers featured. Plus it’s got a trombone solo by James Pankow to close out the tune. The original side 1 had only one Lamm-only song.

Hold On – Cetera closes out side one with another rocker. It’s got some similar DNA to Chicago VIII’s “Hideaway,” buttressed with yet more horns and another fiery guitar solo by Pinnick. It’s still got a lot of Cetera singing all the parts (rather than having Lamm sing backup), but in a rougher song, it’s a bit more palatable.

New Side 2


Doin’ Business – Side 2 opens with a song that is the sister song to Manipulation. It is an up-tempo Lamm-sung tune talking about all the bad stuff about the music business. The similarities between the two songs might’ve been the reason Doin’ Business was left off the record, but there is lots to love. Lamm is on his game with a powerful vocal. The horns are in your face. Pinnick cuts loose yet again with a great solo, but it’s Cetera’s bass playing that really is the surprise. Well, not for long-time fans who knew what he did on the early albums. By the late 70s, Cetera had gradually softened his bass playing. Not here.

Where Did the Lovin’ Go? – Another Cetera ballad, but only the second one on the album and first of the new side 2. The trend of very soft openings that lead into louder sections continues here, but the brass help this song from being just a copycat of Song for You.

I’d Rather Be Rich – Lamm comes back with a tongue-in-cheek song with a riff and tempo reminiscent of Chicago 13’s “Reruns.” Pinnick’s guitar work, unadorned with distortion, fits right into that 1979-1980 guitar sound. Even the brass get an extended break.

Birthday Boy – This is a song that barely made my version of the album. But if we’re being truthful to the time period, Cetera was ascendant while Lamm and Pankow were not as prominent as they had been. But hey: I kicked off Upon Arrival. The lyrics are not great, the keyboard sound is a carbon copy from Where Did The Lovin’ Go, but the brass and Pinnick’s guitar keep this from being a mailed-in song.

The American Dream – Same closer as the original, this Pankow-written, Cetera-sung tune could be brought out on tour in 2018 and most of the lyrics would still apply. More brass goodness, and saxophonist Walt Parazaider gets to bring out his bari sax which is always a good thing.

B-Side



Soldier of Fortune – Of the two never-before-heard bonus songs, this is the better one. You get Lamm singing over his electric piano, tasteful brass hits, and a particularly fun acoustic guitar solo from Pinnick. In truth, Lamm could have remastered this song for his 2003 solo album Subtlety and Passion and it would have easily fit on that album’s groove. With a 10-song limit, Soldier of Fortune shows up as a b-side of the first single, Thunder and Lightning.

Left Off


Live It Up – As great as it was to hear a ‘brand new’ Cetera/Chicago song in 2003 and despite some smooth brass, it’s more of a fun curiosity than anything else. I could cheat and put it as the B-side of the second single, Song for You, but I’m still gonna leave it off. Again, Cetera’s bass playing is really well done. Why didn’t he do more of this?

Upon Arrival – The original second track, it is about as far away from Manipulation as you can get. Cetera is in full-ballad mode here. That’s not the problem. The lyrics are not great. It’s like Cetera was trying to do a slice-of-life song a la “Saturday in the Park” and it doesn’t work. Again, Lamm comes in for some passages, so it’s good for a two-voice song, but ultimately I would leave it off the album. It came down to this or Birthday Boy getting the boot, and Upon Arrival lost.

So, there’s my remixed version of Chicago XIV. Again, I don’t think this would have changed the trajectory of the band, but perhaps this new arrangement creates a more balanced album.
I’d love to hear y’all’s thoughts or even give your own version of XIV. And if you haven’t heard it in awhile, go take a listen. The songs might surprise you.